Learn how to write, and to think, willya?

From a logical perspective, the above post is engaging in logical fallacies. (From a rhetorical perspective, it is engaging in redundancy.)

So let's see. Becuase Oric was using Srebrenica as a base for attacks on Serb civilians, it was "legitimate" for the Serb forces to kill 8,000 civilians and captives. By this same "logic," because Milosevic was using Serbia as a base for atttacks on Muslim Slav and Albanian civilians, it was "legitimate" for Clinton to bomb Belgrade. Oh wait a minute, that one doesn't sound so good, does it?

And then we are told, once again, that the losses at Srebrenica were "exaggerated." No evidence provided, we are supposed to accept this on faith, even though it contradicts the findings of a rigorous international investigation.

And (de regueur) an irrelevant US atrocity (in this case the Highway of Death) is brought up just to further muddy the water. It's as if each ghastly act of mass murder by US imperialism deposits karmic funds in some cosmic bank account from which the Serbs are then entitled to make a withdrawal. Hey, if Big Daddy US Imperialism can wipe out retreating troops, let us have our fun with helpless captives at Srebrenica!

And of course the "context" for Oric's crimes—the cleansing of Muslims from some 70% of Bosnia by the Serb forces—is also neatly ignored.

Same old bullshit. I don't know why I allow my blog to serve as a vehicle for this sick fascistic propaganda. There's a sucker born every minute, I guess...

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.