Eclipsed from the headlines by the ongoing carnage, there is an active
civil resistance in Iraq that opposes the occupation, the torture regime
it protects, and the jihadi and Ba'athist 'resistance' alike.
Anarchist support for the Bolsheviks defnitively ended with crushing of the Kronstadt rebellion in 1921. Emma Goldman didn't write My Disillusionment in Russia until 1923. Plenty of anarchists here in New York, like Dolgoff and Sidney and Clara Solomon, organized support for the Spanish anarchists in the '30s. And apart from muddle-headed quasi-anarchists like the Yippies (much as I love 'em), who are these supposed anarchists who uncritically embraced Fidel?
I am nobody's useful idiot. But a lot of post-lefty types have become useful idiots for a certain George W. Bush...
»
Reply
For more breaking news and world events, seeThe first open media site where anyone can report from anywhere
Advertisements:
The inconvenient facts and unanswered questions surrounding the attacks are legion, but the endemic sloppiness of the self-styled "researchers" is delegitimizing the entire project of critiquing the "official version." The ostentatiously named "Truth movement" is not clearing the air, but muddying the water.
WW4 Report pamphlets
WAR AT THE CROSSROADS
An Historical Guide Through the Balkan Labyrinth
The Balkan region is intensely multicultural - a point of crossroads and clash for some of the world's major religions, cultural spheres, and economic systems. While there have been vicious wars in Balkan history, these have taken place in the context of manipulation by imperial powers and the self-serving local leaders who cater to them.
I smell revisionism
I know you weren't intending to be ironic. That's the sad part.
Speaking of which: how interesting that you will cite the work of anarchists like Dolgoff in order to discredit the left, but dismiss what they have to say about anarchism. Maybe I will check out the works you mention, but nothing I've read on the matter indicates that the anarchists in Spain engaged in forced collectivizations—principally, Dolgoff's The Anarchist Collectives, Murray Bookchin's The Spanish Anarchists, and José Peirats' Anarchists in the Spanish Revolution. All these (anarchist) scholars explicitly say the collectivizations were not forced, and that those who chose to work a small parcel as "individualists" were permitted to do so. Unless you are playing word games, and by "forced collectivizations" you mean forced expropriations. Of course the farms and factories were forcibly expropriated from the capitalists, and I wholeheartedly support this.
Anarchist support for the Bolsheviks defnitively ended with crushing of the Kronstadt rebellion in 1921. Emma Goldman didn't write My Disillusionment in Russia until 1923. Plenty of anarchists here in New York, like Dolgoff and Sidney and Clara Solomon, organized support for the Spanish anarchists in the '30s. And apart from muddle-headed quasi-anarchists like the Yippies (much as I love 'em), who are these supposed anarchists who uncritically embraced Fidel?
I am nobody's useful idiot. But a lot of post-lefty types have become useful idiots for a certain George W. Bush...